我正在编写一个包含动态和静态引用的OSGI应用程序。每个服务都放在不同的捆绑包中。
@Reference (bind = "bindMethod", unbind = "unbindMethod", cardinality = ReferenceCardinality.MANDATORY_UNARY, policy = ReferencePolicy.DYNAMIC)
private final AtomicReference<TestService> testService = new AtomicReference<TestService>();
@Reference (bind = "bindMethod", unbind = "unbindMethod", cardinality = ReferenceCardinality.MANDATORY_UNARY, policy = ReferencePolicy.DYNAMIC)
private AtomicReference<TestService> testService = new AtomicReference<TestService>(); //final is ommitted
protected void bindMethod(TestService atestService)
{
if (TestService.get() == null)
{
testService.set(atestService);
}
}
protected void unbindMethod(TestService atestService)
{
myServices.compareAndSet(testService, null);
}不使用AtomicReference
@Reference (bind = "bindMethod", unbind = "unbindMethod", cardinality = ReferenceCardinality.MANDATORY_UNARY, policy = ReferencePolicy.DYNAMIC)
private TestService testService;
protected void bindMethod(TestService atestService)
{
testService = atestService;
}
protected void unbindMethod(TestService atestService)
{
testService = null;
}推荐使用哪种方法?每种方法对性能有何影响?
发布于 2016-02-05 20:42:23
您将@Reference放在字段中的事实意味着您正在使用具有新的字段注入支持的DS1.3。
在这种情况下,您既不需要绑定/解除绑定方法,也不需要AtomicReference。只要:
@Reference private volatile TestService testService;
易失性意味着它是一个动态引用,并且还提供了适当的并发访问。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35224151
复制相似问题