我正在测试了解Erlang用户指南并发编程部分中的代码。
在tut17.erl中,我使用erl -sname ping启动了一个进程,并以al -sname pong作为指导开始了另一个过程。
-module(tut17).
-export([start_ping/1, start_pong/0, ping/2, pong/0]).
ping(0, Pong_Node) ->
{pong, Pong_Node} ! finished,
io:format("ping finished~n", []);
ping(N, Pong_Node) ->
{pong, Pong_Node} ! {ping, self()},
receive
pong ->
io:format("Ping received pong~n", [])
end,
ping(N - 1, Pong_Node).
pong() ->
receive
finished -> io:format("Pong finished~n", []);
{ping, Ping_PID} ->
io:format("Pong received ping~n", []),
Ping_PID ! pong,
pong()
end.
start_pong() ->
register(pong, spawn(tut17, pong, [])).
start_ping(Pong_Node) ->
spawn(tut17, ping, [3, Pong_Node]).从ping和pong过程中,我可以调用start_ping和start_pong来检查一切正常。
(ping@smcho)1> tut17:start_ping(pong@smcho).
<0.40.0>
Ping received pong
Ping received pong
Ping received pong
ping finished
(pong@smcho)2> tut17:start_pong().
true
Pong received ping
Pong received ping
Pong received ping
Pong finished 我正在尝试从命令行运行相同的代码;对于一个简单的hello world示例:
-module(helloworld).
-export([start/0]).
start() ->
io:fwrite("Hello, world!\n").我使用以下命令行:
erlc helloworld.erl
erl -noshell -s helloworld start -s init stop所以,我试着做了以下几点,但最后还是崩溃了。
erl -noshell -sname ping -s tut17 start_ping pong@smcho -s init stoperl -noshell -sname pong -s tut17 start_pong -s init stop但是,当ping结束时,没有打印任何内容,我就从pong获得了这个错误报告。
=ERROR REPORT==== 6-Mar-2015::20:29:24 ===
Error in process <0.35.0> on node 'ping@smcho' with exit value:
{badarg,[{tut17,ping,2,[{file,"tut17.erl"},{line,9}]}]}与使用命令行的REPL方法相比,每个进程不等待对应方响应,而是在一段时间后停止。可能出什么事了?
发布于 2015-03-07 03:25:39
命令行的参数在使用-s开关时作为原子列表接收,在使用-run开关时作为字符串列表接收。考虑到这一点,让我们考虑一下发生了什么.
此命令是从shell发出的:
erl -noshell -sname ping \
-s tut17 start_ping pong@smcho \
-s init stop因此,start_ping/1是用参数[pong@smcho]调用的。然后,它将ping/2调用为ping(3, [pong@smcho]),在其第一行中尝试执行{pong, [pong@smcho]} ! {ping, self()}。因为列表不是消息的有效目标.你的世界爆炸了。
要从Erlang和system轻松地运行这两种方法,您可以向start_ping/1添加一个子句
start_ping([Pong_Node]) ->
spawn(tut17, ping, [3, Pong_Node]);
start_ping(Pong_Node) ->
start_ping([Pong_Node]).发布于 2015-03-07 05:00:45
需要作出一些改变。
start_ping
根据zxq9的提示,我修改了start_ping函数。
start_ping([Pong_Node]) ->
io:format("Ping started~n", []),
spawn(tut17, ping, [3, Pong_Node]);
start_ping(Pong_Node) ->
start_ping([Pong_Node]).当进程完成时调用init:stop()。
我不确定这是绝对必要的,但它似乎正在进行这项修改。
ping(0, Pong_Node) ->
{pong, Pong_Node} ! finished,
io:format("ping finished~n", []),
init:stop();然后,我可以从shell命令:erl -noshell -sname ping -s tut17 start_ping pong@smcho中删除erl -noshell -sname ping -s tut17 start_ping pong@smcho。
执行命令
乒乓在被调用之前应该被调用。
更新的代码
这是经修订的守则:
-module(tut17).
-export([start_ping/1, start_pong/0, ping/2, pong/0]).
ping(0, Pong_Node) ->
{pong, Pong_Node} ! finished,
io:format("ping finished~n", []),
init:stop();
ping(N, Pong_Node) ->
{pong, Pong_Node} ! {ping, self()},
receive
pong ->
io:format("Ping received pong~n", [])
end,
ping(N - 1, Pong_Node).
pong() ->
receive
finished ->
io:format("Pong finished~n", []),
init:stop();
{ping, Ping_PID} ->
io:format("Pong received ping~n", []),
Ping_PID ! pong,
pong()
end.
start_pong() ->
io:format("Pong started~n", []),
register(pong, spawn(tut17, pong, [])).
start_ping([Pong_Node]) ->
io:format("Ping started~n", []),
spawn(tut17, ping, [3, Pong_Node]);
start_ping(Pong_Node) ->
start_ping([Pong_Node]).shell命令:
erl -noshell -sname ping -s tut17 start_ping pong@smchoerl -noshell -sname pong -s tut17 start_ponghttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/28909965
复制相似问题