blocks|key|5036650|text|我们使用McAfee已经很长时间了，对我们来说效果很好。但是在过去的两三年里，我们发现它变得越来越臃肿，越来越痛苦。在下一年左右的某个时候，我们将考虑更换它，我个人正在考虑和Avast一起去。他们的个人免费版本在我用过的几台家庭电脑和朋友电脑上运行得很好，但当然，管理特性才是关键。他们对企业版进行了60天的试用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5036651|此外，检查所有其他问题标记为“防病毒”，有很多信息。(足够了，这可能会作为dup关闭。)|5036652|作为我自己的参考，下面是前面的一些问题，这些问题都有很多信息。|5036653|具有这些要求的企业级防病毒软件+视窗+Windows+2008+R2实时防病毒软件+Windows最佳网络防病毒+我应该在域控制器上安装AV产品吗？|offset|length|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://serverfault.com/questions/73023/enterprise-level-anti-virus-software-with-these-requirements|1|https://serverfault.com/questions/58810/windows-server-antivirus|2|https://serverfault.com/questions/55571/realtime-antivirus-software-for-windows-server-2008-r2|3|https://serverfault.com/questions/48832/best-network-antivirus-for-windows-xp|4|https://serverfault.com/questions/47819/do-you-run-antivirus-software-on-domain-controllers^0|0|0|0|0|F|0|G|2|1|J|M|2|16|E|3|1L|H|4^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$H|12|I|13|1|14]|$H|15|I|16|1|17]|$H|18|I|19|1|1A]|$H|1B|I|1C|1|1D]|$H|1E|I|1F|1|1G]]|A|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|A|$O|P]]|Q|$5|L|M|N|A|$O|R]]|S|$5|L|M|N|A|$O|T]]|U|$5|L|M|N|A|$O|V]]|W|$5|L|M|N|A|$O|X]]]]

We've used McAfee for a long time and it's worked well for us. But over the past 2 or 3 years we've found that it's gotten more and more bloated and painful to manage. Sometime in the next year or so we'll look at replacing it, personally I'm thinking of going with Avast. Their personal free version works well on the few home and friend computers I've put it on, but of course it's the management features that will be critical. They have a 60-day trial of the enterprise version.

Also, check all the other questions tagged "antivirus," there's a lot of information there. (Enough that this should maybe be closed as a dup.)

For my own reference, here are the previous questions that have the most info.:

<a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/73023/enterprise-level-anti-virus-software-with-these-requirements">Enterprise Level Anti-virus software with these Requirements</a>
<a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/58810/windows-server-antivirus">Windows Server AntiVirus</a>
<a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/55571/realtime-antivirus-software-for-windows-server-2008-r2">Realtime antivirus software for Windows Server 2008 R2</a>
<a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/48832/best-network-antivirus-for-windows-xp">Best Network Antivirus for Windows XP</a>
<a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/47819/do-you-run-antivirus-software-on-domain-controllers">Should I install an AV product on my domain controllers?</a>

blocks|key|938209|text|正如我在这个答案，中提到的，在尝试了其他几个选项之后，我们发现ESET是最好的解决方案。我们把范围缩小到赛门铁克和ESET，并根据每个版本的试用版本做出了决定--这是我推荐的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://serverfault.com/questions/12516/what-is-the-best-antivirus-for-a-windows-domain-network/12524#12524^0|4|5|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

As I mentioned in <a href="https://serverfault.com/questions/12516/what-is-the-best-antivirus-for-a-windows-domain-network/12524#12524">this answer,</a> we found ESET to be the best solution after trying several other options. We had narrowed it down to Symantec and ESET, and made our decision based on playing with the trial versions of each -- something I'd recommend.

blocks|key|938111|text|你不看微软前沿有什么特别的原因吗？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/en/us/default.aspx^0|3|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

Any particular reason you're not looking at <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/en/us/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Microsoft Forefront</a>?

blocks|key|938147|text|我没有一个全面的意见，但我使用了赛门铁克端点保护，它似乎是差不多一样好，这些事情是。集中管理很好，很容易跟上，自动更新工作得很好。我遇到了一些问题，笔记本电脑被切断网络，经常没有收到他们的更新。我通过在这些机器上设置客户端从互联网上获取签名更新来解决这个问题，这对你来说可能是一个选择，也可能不是一个选项，所以要记住一些事情。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I don't have a comprehensive opinion for you, but I have used Symantec Endpoint protection and it seems to be approximately as good as any of these things are. The centralized management is good and easy to keep up with and the automatic updates work pretty well. I have had some problems with laptops that get disconnected from the network regularly not receiving their updates. I solved that by setting the clients on those machines to get signature updates from the internet, which may or may not be an option for you, so something to keep in mind.

blocks|key|938182|text|我们刚转到索弗斯终点站安全中心。http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|938183|您将得到一个非常好的av解决方案，个人防火墙，应用程序控制和设备控制，以一个很好的价格，很容易安装和管理。我们管理着来自瑞士温特图尔的3000多个客户和服务器，这些客户和服务器遍布全球，运行非常顺利。|938184|如果您拥有802.11q网络，则可以授权NAC+(网络访问控制)。通过这些特性，您可以将不兼容的pc移动到一个特殊的网络(vlan)中。|938185|http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/|unordered-list-item|938186|http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/nac/|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1|2^0|G|1F|0|0|0|0|0|1F|1|0|0|1A|2^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|J|7|10|8|@]|9|@$A|11|B|12|1|13]]|C|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|J|7|14|8|@]|9|@$A|15|B|16|1|17]]|C|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|I]]|S|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|I]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|L]]]]

We've just switched to Sophos Endpoint Security.
<a href="http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/</a>

you will get a very good av solution, personal firewall, applicaton control and device control for a good price
It's easy to install and manage. we're managing about 3000 clients and servers which are spread over the whole world from winterthur switzerland and it just runs smooth.

and if you've got a 802.11q network you can license NAC (network access control). With these feature you can for example move non compliant pc's into a special network (vlan).

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/endpoint/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/nac/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.sophos.com/products/enterprise/nac/</a></li>
</ul>

blocks|key|938278|text|找出哪些反病毒更适合您的环境：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|938279|938280|如果你有任何可疑或隔离的文件试图发送到在线服务+-这一次检查提交的文件与38个不同的引擎，结果你可以看到你的候选人是多么成功和快速；|unordered-list-item|offset|length|938281|938282|一旦你缩小了你的选择范围，下载并安装不同控制组的试验，看看结果。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.hrppw.com.cn/^0|0|0|J|4|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|T|8|@]|9|@$F|U|G|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|E|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

Find out what anti-virus works better for your environment: 
- if you have any suspicious or quarantined files try to send them to <a href="http://www.hrppw.com.cn/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">online service</a> - this one checks submitted file against 38 different engines, in results you can see how successful and fast are your candidates; 
- once you narrowed your choice, download and install trials for different control groups and see the outcome.

blocks|key|938345|text|我有赛门铁克端点保护和卡巴斯基的经验。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|938346|我们两年前就开始使用SEP11了，当它发布时，它遇到了相当严重的问题(被锁在服务器之外，客户机速度极慢，失去更新连接等等)，但许多问题现在已经解决了。即使如此，我仍然发现SEP给旧机器带来了沉重的负担。我不推荐SEP。|938347|卡巴斯基更轻量级，但我们在测试中遇到了一些冲突，这使得它不适合我们的环境。值得一试。|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

I have some had experience with both Symantec Endpoint Protection and Kaspersky.

We started using SEP11 two years ago, and it had fairly significant problems when it when it was released (being locked out of servers, extremely slow clients, losing update connections, and more), but many of those issues have been resolved now. Even so, I still find that SEP places quite a heavy burden on older machines. I would not recommend SEP.

Kaspersky is quite a bit more lightweight, but we encountered a few conflicts during testing that made it inappropriate for our environment. It could be worth trying out.

We have 55+ workstations (MS only) and looking for security suite software. I am looking at ESET Security suite, Symantec Endpoint protection, Trend-micro worry-free business security or McAfee Total protection.

Can the experts give me any opinion regarding this matter? Thank you in advance for any ideas.

Security suite software

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

EdgeOne AI 安全实战专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我们有55+工作站(仅MS)，并寻找安全套件软件。我正在寻找ESET安全套件，赛门铁克终端保护，趋势-微无忧无虑的商业安全或McAfee全面保护。对于这件事，专家能给我什么意见吗？提前感谢您的任何想法。

问安全套件软件
EN

回答 7

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问安全套件软件EN

回答 7

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问安全套件软件
EN