percentile_cont::= PERCENTILE_CONT "(" percentile ")" WITHIN GROUP "(" ORDER BY expr [DESC|ASC] [NULLS ,给定一个百分比值percentile,返回对应百分比所在的插值。 当给定的percentile为0.5时,返回结果是组内排序键的中位数。不指定OVER关键字语法时,本函数是聚合函数。本函数不支持向量化计算。 percentile百分比值percentile只允许数值类型和可隐式转换为数值类型的其他数据类型。percentile取值范围为[0, 1],否则报错。 给定的百分比值percentile记为P,组内非空数据行数为N。通过公式RowNum = 1 + P * ( N - 1)计算得到RowNum。
我们在获取影像的百分比值使用的函数是ee.Reducer.percentile,但是会存在很多问题有时候会发现我们获取不同百分比值的时候数值会不一样,可能导致结果不同。 函数: ee.Reducer.percentile(percentiles, outputNames, maxBuckets, minBucketWidth, maxRaw) Create a reducer filterBounds(geometry).mosaic().clip(geometry) //original var list1 = image.reduceRegion(ee.Reducer.percentile ([5,25,50,75,95]),geometry,10,null,null,false,1e12) print(list1) // the value of each percentile is same var image_95 = image.reduceRegion({ 'reducer': ee.Reducer.percentile({ 'percentiles
index-append 301.696 ms 90th percentile service time index-append 444.837 ms 99th percentile service percentile service time default 4.45552 ms 99.9th percentile service time default 9.09098 ms 100th percentile ms 99.9th percentile latency term 42.9865 ms 100th percentile latency term 45.2784 ms 50th percentile ms 99.9th percentile latency phrase 22.6104 ms 100th percentile latency phrase 26.7837 ms 50th percentile ms 100th percentile latency scroll 643.218 ms 50th percentile service time scroll 606.853 ms 90th percentile
latency index-stats 3.455013706 ms 90th percentile latency index-stats 3.865102708 ms 99th percentile latency node-stats 3.845604981 ms 90th percentile latency node-stats 4.411485343 ms 99th percentile latency node-stats 7.24903738 ms 99.9th percentile latency node-stats 30.31716143 ms 100th percentile latency term 3.888126492 ms 90th percentile latency term 4.309532285 ms 99th percentile latency term ms 50th percentile service time term 3.183407011 ms 90th percentile service time term 3.321979992 ms
latency | index-append | 1668.42 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | index-stats | 10.6119 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | node-stats | 8.49078 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | default | 11.3709 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | term | 4.76169 | ms | | 50th percentile
latency node-stats 3.296191 ms 90th percentile latency node-stats 3.799131 ms 99th percentile latency 5.385959 ms 99.9th percentile latency default 8.354142 ms 100th percentile latency default 9.191337 ms 50th percentile service time default 3.050713 ms 90th percentile service time default 3.320561 ms ms 99.9th percentile latency term 7.350553 ms 100th percentile latency term 14.43949 ms 50th percentile percentile service time phrase 3.2294 ms 99.9th percentile service time phrase 14.31686 ms 100th percentile
10.33466 ms 99.9th percentile latency default 22.50608 ms 100th percentile latency default 26.34883 ms 50th percentile service time default 7.163304 ms 90th percentile service time default 7.841727 ms ms 99.9th percentile latency term 28.44925 ms 100th percentile latency term 30.47515 ms 50th percentile service time term 6.956592 ms 90th percentile service time term 7.521901 ms 99th percentile service percentile service time phrase 8.131189 ms 99.9th percentile service time phrase 28.56503 ms 100th percentile
latency index-append 356.13 ms 90th percentile latency index-append 1044.3 ms 99th percentile latency index-append 2036.47 ms 100th percentile latency index-append 2761.67 ms 50th percentile latency index-stats 3.76232 ms 90th percentile latency index-stats 4.31119 ms 99th percentile latency index-stats 25.0359 ms 99.9th percentile latency index-stats 87.6608 ms 100th percentile ms 99.9th percentile latency term 12.8783 ms 100th percentile latency term 19.7935 ms 50th percentile
latency node-stats 3.69659 ms 90th percentile latency node-stats 4.27771 ms 99th percentile latency percentile service time default 3.60439 ms 99.9th percentile service time default 5.87795 ms 100th percentile 99.9th percentile latency term 6.03389 ms 100th percentile latency term 7.04569 ms 50th percentile service ms 99.9th percentile latency phrase 14.8293 ms 100th percentile latency phrase 20.7531 ms 50th percentile ms 100th percentile latency scroll 639.222 ms 50th percentile service time scroll 615.78 ms 90th percentile
2.03125 ms -21.17% 99th percentile latency default 15.3999 15.3726 -0.02733 ms -0.18% 100th percentile ms -14.21% 99th percentile latency term 22.8338 16.6021 -6.23172 ms -27.29% 100th percentile latency ms +13.01% 99th percentile latency range 25.3066 27.5328 2.22616 ms +8.80% 100th percentile latency +42.44% 90th percentile service time range 17.3298 18.4377 1.10789 ms +6.39% 99th percentile service ms -4.99% 99th percentile latency scroll 478.402 508.923 30.5212 ms +6.38% 100th percentile latency
273.913 ms 99th percentile service time country_agg_uncached 297.431 ms 100th percentile service time 2.41103 ms 99.9th percentile service time country_agg_cached 6.71132 ms 100th percentile service time ms 100th percentile latency scroll 629.479 ms 50th percentile service time scroll 601.664 ms 90th percentile latency expression 480.244 ms 90th percentile latency expression 497.217 ms 99th percentile latency 478.77 ms 90th percentile service time expression 496.211 ms 99th percentile service time expression
越小越好 100th percentile latency node-stats 提交请求和收到完整回复之间的时间段 越小越好 50th percentile service time node-stats 越小越好 90th percentile service time default 请求处理开始和接收完整响应之间的时间段 越小越好 99th percentile service time default 越小越好 99.9th percentile service time term 请求处理开始和接收完整响应之间的时间段 越小越好 100th percentile service time term 越小越好 90th percentile service time phrase 请求处理开始和接收完整响应之间的时间段 越小越好 99th percentile service time phrase percentile latency decay_geo_gauss_script_score 提交请求和收到完整回复之间的时间段 越小越好 50th percentile service time
percentile: 13.10 ms 95 percentile: 13.70 ms 98 percentile: 14.20 ms 99 percentile: 14.60 ms 99.5 percentile: 15.10 ms 99.6 percentile: 14.70 ms 99 percentile: 15.00 ms 99.5 percentile: 15.50 ms 99.6 percentile: 15.20 ms 99 percentile: 15.70 ms 99.5 percentile: 17.00 ms 99.6 percentile: 17.00 ms 99 percentile: 20.00 ms 99.5 percentile: 22.20 ms 99.6 percentile:
latency index-append 757.069 ms 90th percentile latency index-append 1558.87 ms 99th percentile latency index-append 3131.2 ms 99.9th percentile latency index-append 4159.98 ms 100th percentile latency index-stats 3.74153 ms 90th percentile latency index-stats 4.26026 ms 99th percentile latency index-stats 5.06623 ms 99.9th percentile latency index-stats 10.9303 ms 100th percentile ms 99.9th percentile latency term 6.21686 ms 100th percentile latency term 7.67519 ms 50th percentile
latency | index-append | 4678.18 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | index-stats | 88.8076 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | node-stats | 98.339 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | default | 22.3396 | ms | | 50th percentile latency | term | 16.8316 | ms | | 50th percentile
confidence limit at depth 0-5cm % AWC_000_005_95 The soil attribute's 95th percentile confidence limit confidence limit at depth 60-100cm % AWC_060_100_95 The soil attribute's 95th percentile confidence confidence limit at depth 100-200cm % AWC_100_200_95 The soil attribute's 95th percentile confidence confidence limit at depth 0-5cm g/cm^3 BDW_000_005_95 The soil attribute's 95th percentile confidence confidence limit at depth 60-100cm % CLY_060_100_95 The soil attribute's 95th percentile confidence
()计算 percentile(col, p) OVER ([PARTITION BY ...] | 5.5| +------+ 6.海量数据时可以使用percentile_approx 近似计算 如果数据集非常大,排序可能会非常耗时。 在这种情况下,可以使用percentile_approx函数,它提供了一个近似的百分位数计算,通常比percentile函数更快。 和percentile 的结果不一样呢? 这个和percentile_approx 的计算方式有关。
和percentile_approx。 NOTE: A true percentile can only be computed for integer values. Use PERCENTILE_APPROX if your input is non-integral. Use PERCENTILE_APPROX if your input is non-integral. 也就是说,真正的中位数只能用percentile来计算,输入需要为整数类型,使用percentile_approx(输入为浮点型)计算得到的并不是真正的中位数,也就是所说的近似中位数,经过大量数据验证,
更多请参考官网 ---- 案例 需求:在200ms以内的,有百分之多少,在1000毫秒以内的有百分之多少 , 那就要用到 percentile ranks metric 啦 。 group_by_province": { "terms": { "field": "province" }, "aggs": { "latency_percentile_ranks ": { "percentile_ranks": { "field": "latency", "values": [ 0, "buckets": [ { "key": "新疆", "doc_count": 6, "latency_percentile_ranks } }, { "key": "江苏", "doc_count": 6, "latency_percentile_ranks
client == "mobile") %>% select(measure, date, p50, p90) %>% pivot_longer(c(p50, p90), names_to = "percentile ") %>% mutate(year = str_sub(date, 1, 4)) %>% mutate(name = paste(percentile, year, sep = "_")) %>% mutate(x = c(0.45, 1, -0.57, -1)) %>% mutate(label = case_when(percentile == "p50" ~ paste0 ("Peso\nmediano:\n", round(value), " KB"), percentile == "p90" ~ paste0("Percentil 90:\n", round( aes(x = x, size = value, color = year), y = 0, alpha = 0.5, data = filter(mobile_bytes, percentile